ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026
Semantic knowledge of words is necessary to produce an incidental self-reference effect.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Encoding information in relation to the self produces a memory advantage compared with other encoding methods. Termed the self-reference effect (SRE), this self-memory advantage has typically been demonstrated when people explicitly evaluate the self-relevancy of to-be-remembered target stimuli. Notably, recent works showed that simply indicating the location of target stimuli in relation to a self-relevant versus other-relevant cue (e.g., one's own or another person's name) under a non-evaluative, non-referential encoding context produces a self-memory advantage. What accounts for this incidental SRE (iSRE)? In the current study, by varying the semantic properties of target stimuli, we asked whether the iSRE mainly results from (a) spontaneous evaluative self-referencing, (b) spontaneous semantic self-referencing, or (c) perceptual processing of target stimuli in spatio-temporal relation to a self-relevant cue. During encoding, participants indicated whether trait adjectives, concrete nouns, or pseudowords were presented to the left or right of their own, their friend's, or a stranger's name. In a subsequent source memory test, we found better source memory for words paired with one's own name versus their friend's and a stranger's name for trait adjectives and concrete nouns but not for pseudowords, with the magnitude of the iSRE similar for trait adjectives and concrete nouns. No self-memory advantage with pseudowords suggests that perceptual processing of target stimuli in relation to a self-cue is insufficient to produce an iSRE, but rather the iSRE draws on a basic semantic connection between the self and a simultaneously presented target stimulus. Potential mechanisms underlying the iSRE, implications, and future research directions are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.