Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41888441›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

GHMS-CycleGAN: Graph-Based Hierarchical Multi-stain CycleGAN for Stain Normalization and Classification in Digital Pathology.

Mohamed Elmanna, Ahmed Elsafty, Yomna Ahmed, Muhammad Rushdi, Ahmed Morsy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohamed ElmannaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Systems, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Cairo University St, Giza, 12613, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4469-0077
Ahmed ElsaftyPathOlOgics, LLC for Validated Automated Analytical and Post-Analytical Pathology Services, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7067-4962
Yomna AhmedPathOlOgics, LLC for Validated Automated Analytical and Post-Analytical Pathology Services, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-5843-0446
Muhammad RushdiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Systems, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Cairo University St, Giza, 12613, Egypt. mrushdi@eng1.cu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9869-0270
Ahmed MorsyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Systems, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Cairo University St, Giza, 12613, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0198-2937

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of digital pathology (DP) has provided numerous computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) opportunities and tools based primarily on deep learning (DL) approaches. However, staining variations and distortions caused by DP scanners during image digitization pose challenges and cause performance degradation in DL-based CAD systems. In this work, we introduce novel methods of stain and scan normalization for histopathology, red blood cell (RBC), and white blood cell (WBC) image classification. In particular, we propose a novel framework for multi-stain and color normalization using hierarchical multi-stain cycle-consistent generative adversarial networks (HMS-CycleGAN) and graph-based HMS-CycleGAN (GHMS-CycleGAN). Our method effectively learns image normalization mappings by exploiting underlying hierarchical and network structures in DP images. The proposed framework was validated on histopathology, RBC, and WBC image datasets collected from different scanners and institutions to assess the impact of the proposed CycleGAN-based normalization methods on the downstream task of image classification. The results show that the HMS-CycleGAN normalizer can generate significantly more robust and consistent normalization across diverse staining variations compared to state-of-the-art methods. Also, our normalization methods consistently lead to superior classification performance compared to classifiers trained without image normalization and those using three state-of-the-art methods. HMS-CycleGAN achieved the best classification accuracy (84.05%) on the Wilds Camelyon dataset and the best F1-score for WBC classification (51.06%), while both HMS-CycleGAN and GHMS-CycleGAN excelled in cross-scanner RBC image classification, reaching F1-scores between 80 and 91%. The experimental results highlight the importance of image normalization in building robust and generalizable DL-based models for improved downstream image classification in DP.

Indexed as

Blood cell classificationCycleGANDigital pathologyGraph-based cycle lossHierarchical cycle lossStain normalization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.