ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2026
Computational fluid dynamics assessment of altered hemodynamics in the Circle of Willis during acute ischemic stroke and the impact of cerebral collateral development.
Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cerebral collateral assessment has become a common metric for treatment planning in acute ischemic stroke patients due to clinical evidence that well-developed collateral networks are correlated with favorable patient outcomes for reperfusion therapies, such as intravenous thrombolytics and mechanical thrombectomy. However, the mechanisms driving these outcome disparities are not well clarified. In the present study, a computational model is used to help clarify these mechanisms by assessing the Circle of Willis hemodynamics during middle cerebral artery occlusion with different levels of collateral development present. The results showed that middle cerebral artery occlusion causes up to a 30% increase in systemic mean arterial pressure, but the increase is less severe in cases with better collateralization, and cases with well-developed collaterals had up to a 66% lower pressure drop across the clot compared to the cases with poor collateral development. The ipsilateral collateral flow increased up to 20-fold following occlusion, which elevated blood flow and mixing distal to the occlusion. These results indicate that cerebral collaterals serve multiple functions that are important to consider in stroke cases. First, collaterals compensate for part of the lost blood flow to the affected brain region by permitting retrograde flow toward the distal end of the occluded vessel. Second, collaterals reduce the pressure forces on the clot, which can improve the susceptibility to reperfusion therapies. Overall, this study shows that we can leverage our unique computational model to better understand the importance of cerebral collateral circulation during stroke and the influence of collaterals on therapeutic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.