Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41888410›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Attentional semantic attack for enhancing adversarial samples transferability.

Pengju Wang, Jing Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pengju WangCollege of Computer Science, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010010, China.
Jing LiuCollege of Computer Science, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010010, China. liujing@imu.edu.cn.

Funding

The Inner Mongolia Key R&D and Achievement Transformation Project No.2025YFDZ0029The Natural Science Foundation of China No.62462047The Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia of China No.2023ZD18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep neural networks (DNNs) are highly susceptible to adversarial attacks, which can induce erroneous model outputs. While current adversarial attack methods demonstrate high efficacy in white-box settings, their performance often diminishes in black-box scenarios due to the limited transferability. Analysis of attention mechanisms across diverse DNNs reveals that, despite structural differences, models produce similar attentional semantic property for the same inputs and consequently make similar predictions. In this work, we innovatively propose attentional perturbation, which captures and modifies the similar attentional semantic property of the source and victim models to induce misclassification across multiple models. To efficiently use attentional perturbations, we propose an Attentional Semantic Attack method, called ASA. ASA employs attentional perturbation to degrade the attentional semantic property of original samples, optimizing a loss function to minimize the semantic property and thereby inducing model misclassification. The attentional perturbation is iteratively added to the original samples to generate adversarial samples with high transferability. Extensive experiments conducted on ImageNet demonstrate that ASA achieves better transferability than state-of-the-art adversarial attacks.

Indexed as

Adversarial attackAttentional perturbationTransferability

Identifiers

PMID41888410
PMCPMC13039846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.