Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41888402›Full record

ArticleCommunications psychology2026

Scene variability affects action decisions, confidence and behaviour dynamics.

David Aguilar-Lleyda, Antonio González-Del Pozo, Joan López-Moliner, Cristina de la Malla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David Aguilar-LleydaVision and Control of Action Group, Department of Cognition, Development, and Psychology of Education, Institute of Neurosciences, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. aguilarlleyda@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6963-4069
Antonio González-Del PozoVision and Control of Action Group, Department of Cognition, Development, and Psychology of Education, Institute of Neurosciences, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Joan López-MolinerVision and Control of Action Group, Department of Cognition, Development, and Psychology of Education, Institute of Neurosciences, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Cristina de la MallaVision and Control of Action Group, Department of Cognition, Development, and Psychology of Education, Institute of Neurosciences, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans often unfold their actions within complex, variable environments. While such variability is sometimes irrelevant to task success, it could still influence both action decisions and confidence in their outcome. We used immersive virtual reality to examine how scene variability affects each of these processes, while also testing whether its influence extends to the dynamics of information sampling and motor execution. Our task simulated a street-crossing scenario where participants saw six cars approaching a crosswalk. In separate conditions, participants judged their confidence in crossing successfully or attempted to cross if deciding so. Across trials, scene variability was manipulated by changing the cars' relative velocities. Higher scene variability led participants to report lower confidence and to attempt crossing less often. Moreover, it delayed crossing initiation, which participants compensated for by moving slightly faster once committed to the action. These kinematic adjustments indicate flexible online control in response to environmental variability. Consistent with this interpretation, overall crossing performance remained high across variability conditions, suggesting that such adjustments enabled participants to maintain successful outcomes despite increased scene complexity. Additionally, eye movement patterns revealed that trials with high confidence and attempted crossings were associated with faster information acquisition engagement and subsequent disengagement. Our findings suggest that, even when irrelevant for action success, variability can shape not only confidence and action decisions but also the dynamics of motor execution. This highlights the importance of accounting for variability to fully understand sensorimotor tasks in dynamic complex environments.

Identifiers

PMID41888402
PMCPMC13187009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.