ArticleCommunications psychology2026
Scene variability affects action decisions, confidence and behaviour dynamics.
Article in Communications psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Humans often unfold their actions within complex, variable environments. While such variability is sometimes irrelevant to task success, it could still influence both action decisions and confidence in their outcome. We used immersive virtual reality to examine how scene variability affects each of these processes, while also testing whether its influence extends to the dynamics of information sampling and motor execution. Our task simulated a street-crossing scenario where participants saw six cars approaching a crosswalk. In separate conditions, participants judged their confidence in crossing successfully or attempted to cross if deciding so. Across trials, scene variability was manipulated by changing the cars' relative velocities. Higher scene variability led participants to report lower confidence and to attempt crossing less often. Moreover, it delayed crossing initiation, which participants compensated for by moving slightly faster once committed to the action. These kinematic adjustments indicate flexible online control in response to environmental variability. Consistent with this interpretation, overall crossing performance remained high across variability conditions, suggesting that such adjustments enabled participants to maintain successful outcomes despite increased scene complexity. Additionally, eye movement patterns revealed that trials with high confidence and attempted crossings were associated with faster information acquisition engagement and subsequent disengagement. Our findings suggest that, even when irrelevant for action success, variability can shape not only confidence and action decisions but also the dynamics of motor execution. This highlights the importance of accounting for variability to fully understand sensorimotor tasks in dynamic complex environments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.