ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Machine learning predicts sepsis deterioration trajectories.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting sepsis risk in pleural effusion patients.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Infectious Disease Care: Selected Applications in Tuberculosis, Sepsis, and Antimicrobial Stewardship.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Predictive Model for Critical Illness Infection in Hospitalized Children with RSV Infection: A Retrospective Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A landmark-based dynamic prediction model for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: integrating perioperative and postoperative trajectories.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sepsis has heterogeneous clinical trajectories, but conventional severity scores offer only static risk estimates. Timely, dynamic prediction could enable personalized intervention. In this multicenter retrospective study of 47,936 ICU patients meeting Sepsis-3 criteria from one institutional and two public datasets (MIMIC-III, eICU; sensitivity in MIMIC-IV), group-based trajectory modeling identified latent recovery patterns. An ensemble machine-learning model incorporating dynamic physiological variability was trained, temporally validated, and externally tested; clinical impact was assessed following implementation. Three trajectories emerged: rapid recovery (41.5%), slow recovery (36.4%), and clinical deterioration (22.1%). In the final binary classification task, AUROC was 0.92 (development), 0.89 (internal), 0.84 (MIMIC-III) and 0.77 (eICU); median warning time before deterioration was 17.6 h (Overall pooled across all cohorts). Reduced heart rate variability (SD < 10 bpm) predicted mortality (adjusted HR 2.17). Implementation reduced ICU stay by 1.8 days, machanical ventilation by 2.3 days, and 28-day mortality by 5.7%. This externally validated trajectory-based model offers accurate, early risk stratification for sepsis, supporting proactive, individualized critical care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.