ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2026
Latent Profile Analysis of Distinct Patterns of Treatment and Assessment Practices among Youth Mental Health Providers.
Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evaluations of youth mental health providers’ treatment and assessment practices have largely examined trends in evidence-based treatment (EBT) and standardized measures use separately. Evidence-based practice (EBP) integrates EBTs with accurate, valid assessment. Thus, there is a need to understand how individual providers integrate treatment and assessment practices in routine care. To address this gap, the current study used latent profile analysis to derive distinct profiles of assessment and treatment practices, identified provider and practice settings characteristics that predict profiles, and compared provider-reported top influences on their current practices between profiles. In a multidisciplinary national survey, 1,092 youth mental health providers self-reported their assessment (i.e., use of standardized, unstandardized assessment measures) and treatment (i.e., strategies common across EBTs for multiple problem areas, strategic specific to EBTs for a single problem area, and strategies not included in EBTs for any of the problem areas) practices. Four distinct profiles were identified. The largest profile, “EBT Eclectics” (73%), reported a mix of common and specific EBT and other treatment strategies and unstandardized measures, but minimal standardized measures use. The profile that most closely resembled EBP, “EBP Integrationists” (17%), reported frequent use of common and specific EBT strategies alongside some standardized measures use. The two smaller profiles were differentiated by their relative use of specific EBT (“Key Ingredients Specialists”, 6%) and other treatment strategies (“Generalists”, 5%). Profiles were differentiated by provider and practice characteristics, and provider-reported top influences. Findings highlight future directions to enhance EBP in routine care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.