ArticleCommunications engineering2026
A miniature ultrasonic surgical device based on a flextensional configuration with a pre-stressed piezoelectric stack.
Article in Communications engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ultrasonic bone scalpels are known to offer benefits of low cutting force, high precision, low microdamage around the cut site, and tissue selectivity in surgical procedures. However, all current commercial devices are too large to be integrated with the flexible endo-wrist of a surgical robot, and therefore, there is a significant gap for innovation in miniature devices. Ultrasonic bone scalpels in use in clinical settings are all based on a bolted Langevin transducer (BLT), which consists of a pre-stressed piezoceramic ring stack, two end masses, and a cutting blade. The BLT-based device must operate in resonance to achieve sufficient displacement amplitude at the surgical tip to cut through bone, and this dictates its size. Flextensional transducers have emerged as an alternative, but these transducers generally contain a low volume of piezoelectric driving material, and hence cannot excite the required displacement amplitude, and their reliance on adhesive bonds in their fabrication means they fail at the excitation levels required for a bone surgery device. We present a flextensional configuration that forms an ultrasonic surgical device, where the vibration-amplifying metal caps are excited by a pre-stressed piezoelectric stack. In vitro ultrasonic bone cutting tests facilitated with a Kuka robot are performed for a range of cutting speeds and penetration rates. The results demonstrate effective integration with a Kuka robot and that bone cutting can be achieved with an extremely low cutting force ( < 1 N) and high precision (the width of the bone cut presents under 6% deviation from the thickness of the blade). The flextensional device overcomes both the large size of conventional ultrasonic osteotomy devices and the displacement amplitude limitations of other miniaturisation approaches. Integration with an articulated robotic endo-wrist is enabled, establishing a foundation for low-force and high-precision ultrasonic bone cutting in minimally invasive, anatomically constrained robotic surgical environments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.