Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41888379›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Design and evaluation of a systematic finger-based intervention for early numeracy in 5- to 6-year-olds.

Stephanie Roesch, Melissa Conze, Korbinian Moeller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephanie RoeschHector Research Institute of Education Sciences and Psychology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. stephanie.roesch@uni-tuebingen.de.
Melissa ConzeDepartment of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Korbinian MoellerDepartment of Mathematics Education, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early numeracy is a building block for later mathematics achievement in school. Recently, the use of fingers in early numeracy instruction received increasing attention as a prominent example of embodied cognition. Accordingly, the present study developed and evaluated a finger-based intervention for early numeracy skills (involving 12 sessions of 30 min each) that (1) systematically aligns with early numeracy development on all three levels (counting, cardinality understanding, and basic arithmetic) proposed by a recent model of numerical development and (2) using fingers as primary and embodied manipulatives. In a pre-posttest intervention design, 33 5-to-6-year-old children received the finger-based numeracy intervention and were compared to children of a business-as-usual control group (n = 37). Results indicated a significant medium-sized beneficial effect on early numeracy, whereas no significant improvements were observed for spatial working memory or fluid reasoning. Interestingly, the number of finger users increased from pre- to posttest but did not differ between children who received or did not receive the finger-based intervention. Irrespective of group assignment, finger users consistently outperformed non-finger-users in early numeracy. Taken together, these findings highlight that finger use is a powerful and beneficial approach for fostering the development of early numeracy.

Indexed as

CognitionFingersMathematicsChildChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermEarly numeracyEmbodimentFinger countingIntervention

Identifiers

PMID41888379
PMCPMC13031659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.