ArticleScientific reports2026
Mechanical tunability of oriented and random electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds via concentration, molecular weight, and environment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Achieving precise mechanical control in electrospun fibrous scaffolds remains a critical challenge for tissue engineering, where scaffold stiffness, strength, and extensibility must be tailored to diverse biological environments. Here, we establish a systematic framework for tuning the mechanical behavior of electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) fibers by integrating molecular-weight blending, polymer concentration control, fiber orientation, and environmental exposure within a single study. High-molecular-weight PCL (H-PCL) and blends with low-molecular-weight PCL (L-PCL) were electrospun to produce fibers with controlled diameters, morphologies, and orientations. Fiber alignment emerged as the dominant structural factor governing mechanical performance: oriented fibers exhibited substantially higher stiffness (~ 90–140 MPa) and tensile strength (up to ~ 100 MPa), while randomly deposited fibers showed markedly greater extensibility (up to ~ 1000%). Polymer concentration and resulting fiber diameter further modulated stiffness, with optimal mechanical performance observed at intermediate concentrations (~ 10–12% w/v). Molecular-weight blending provided an additional route to tailor fiber morphology and modulus, with oriented fibers reaching peak stiffness at ~ 50–60% H-PCL. Environmental exposure studies revealed that acidic treatments (formic and acetic acid solutions) reduce stiffness in a concentration- and temperature-dependent manner, whereas physiological soaking in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, 37 °C) largely preserves scaffold integrity. Collectively, the electrospun scaffolds developed here span a broad mechanical window (~ 5–140 MPa). When positioned against literature-reported electrospun PCL scaffolds for cardiac, bone, and muscle tissue engineering, this range bridges multiple application-relevant stiffness regimes. These results provide a unified structure–property framework for designing mechanically tunable PCL fibrous scaffolds across diverse biomedical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.