ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning-based prediction of compressive and flexural strength of wheat straw reinforced sustainable gypsum composites.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The environmental burden associated with conventional cement-based materials has intensified research for sustainable alternatives with lower carbon footprints. For this, gypsum-based composites reinforced with agricultural waste, such as wheat straw, offer a promising solution. However, their mechanical performance is governed by nonlinear and complex interactions among multiple mixture parameters. This study proposes a comprehensive machine learning (ML) framework to predict the compressive and flexural strength of wheat straw reinforced gypsum composites. A dataset comprising 161 experimental samples was used and five ML models: artificial neural network, Gaussian process regression (GPR), random forest, extreme gradient boosting, and support vector machine, were used. Model performance was assessed using tenfold cross-validation with multiple statistical metrics along with Taylor diagram analysis. Among the evaluated models, GPR demonstrated superior predictive capability for both compressive and flexural strength, while providing uncertainty quantification that enhances reliability for engineering applications. Feature importance and SHapley Additive exPlanations analyses were employed to improve model interpretability, revealing gypsum strength as the most influential parameter, with water-related parameters, wheat straw content, and chemical additives contributing secondary effects. The proposed ML-based framework provides acceptable and interpretable predictions, offering the optimization of sustainable gypsum composites while reducing experimental efforts and supporting environment-friendly construction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.