ArticleScientific reports2026
Multimodal system for automated medical documentation and clinical decision support integrating contact center solutions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The article presents the Parrot AI smart system, which supports physicians specialising in internal medicine and pediatrics. The solution is designed to automate time-consuming administrative processes and assist physicians in clinical decision-making. The main purpose of the system is to relieve medical staff of administrative tasks, such as manually filling out medical records, which translates into increased work efficiency and more time to focus on direct contact with patients. Parrot AI uses advanced natural language processing methods and generative language models to enable automated semantic analysis of medical interviews. Based on this, the system generates the content necessary to complete the electronic medical records and assists the physician by suggesting preliminary diagnoses and treatment options. Interaction with the patient can take place both at the initial medical interview stage (via chatbot or voicebot) and during a personal appointment at the clinic. Functional tests have demonstrated that the solution is highly effective. All tested components of the system achieved results well above the 80% effectiveness threshold, confirming the validity of further implementing the system into everyday clinical practice. Parrot AI has the potential not only to streamline physicians’ work, but also to improve the quality and consistency of medical records.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.