ArticleScientific reports2026
Physically-based modelling for retrospective detection of archaeological proxies (cropmarks).
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Physically-based modelling for retrospective detection of archaeological proxies (cropmarks).Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying spectral anomalies such as cropmarks is a valuable approach to detecting concealed archaeological sites. In this study, we explore a physically based modeling strategy, interpreting cropmarks as stress-induced changes in vegetation, governed by radiative transfer dynamics. Measurements were obtained from a controlled test field during two campaigns conducted 13 years apart. Using PROSAIL in both forward and inverse modes, combined with statistical modeling, we construct synthetic spectral datasets to augment limited observations, thus facilitating robust training of classification models. An ensemble of machine learning algorithms is applied, with classifiers trained on synthetic data and refined via majority voting. The models achieve detection rates exceeding 90% on earlier observations, demonstrating effective retrospective application. Results highlight the influence of plant growth phase, with peak greenness data yielding stronger performance. Interestingly, injected noise improves robustness, albeit modestly. This study establishes a reproducible pipeline for archaeological prospection, merging physical simulation with machine learning. The integration of synthetic data offers a promising solution to data scarcity, and opens pathways for applying predictive models to archive aerial and satellite imagery, thereby potentially transforming remote sensing strategies in heritage research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.