Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41888288›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Physically-based modelling for retrospective detection of archaeological proxies (cropmarks).

Elias Gravanis, Athos Agapiou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elias GravanisDepartment of Civil Engineering and Geomatics, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, 3036, Cyprus. elias.gravanis@cut.ac.cy.
Athos AgapiouDepartment of Civil Engineering and Geomatics, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, 3036, Cyprus.

Funding

UK Research and Innovation 10050486
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying spectral anomalies such as cropmarks is a valuable approach to detecting concealed archaeological sites. In this study, we explore a physically based modeling strategy, interpreting cropmarks as stress-induced changes in vegetation, governed by radiative transfer dynamics. Measurements were obtained from a controlled test field during two campaigns conducted 13 years apart. Using PROSAIL in both forward and inverse modes, combined with statistical modeling, we construct synthetic spectral datasets to augment limited observations, thus facilitating robust training of classification models. An ensemble of machine learning algorithms is applied, with classifiers trained on synthetic data and refined via majority voting. The models achieve detection rates exceeding 90% on earlier observations, demonstrating effective retrospective application. Results highlight the influence of plant growth phase, with peak greenness data yielding stronger performance. Interestingly, injected noise improves robustness, albeit modestly. This study establishes a reproducible pipeline for archaeological prospection, merging physical simulation with machine learning. The integration of synthetic data offers a promising solution to data scarcity, and opens pathways for applying predictive models to archive aerial and satellite imagery, thereby potentially transforming remote sensing strategies in heritage research.

Indexed as

Archaeological prospectionArchaeological proxiesCropmarksMachine learningPredictive accuracyPredictive modelling

Identifiers

PMID41888288
PMCPMC13172360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.