Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41888285›Full record

ArticleSpine deformity2026

Cervical kyphosis correction and clinico-radiographic outcome assessment: a single centre experience.

Sivaraman Kumarasamy, Dattaraj Parmanand Sawarkar, Pankaj Kumar Singh, Satish Kumar Verma, Rajesh Meena, Ramesh Doddamani, Manoj Phalak, Deepak Agrawal, Rajinder Kumar Laythalling, Poodipedi Sarat Chandra and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Spine deformity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sivaraman Kumarasamy *Department of Neurosurgery, Neurosciences Center, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Dattaraj Parmanand Sawarkar *Department of Neurosurgery, Neurosciences Center, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Pankaj Kumar SinghDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurosciences Center, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India. drpankajsingh11@gmail.com.
Satish Kumar VermaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurosciences Center, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Rajesh MeenaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurosciences Center, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Ramesh DoddamaniDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurosciences Center, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Manoj PhalakDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurosciences Center, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Deepak AgrawalDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurosciences Center, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Rajinder Kumar LaythallingDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurosciences Center, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Poodipedi Sarat ChandraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurosciences Center, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Shashank Sharad KaleDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurosciences Center, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical kyphosis is a rare debilitating condition that leads to functional disability. Surgical correction of cervical kyphosis is challenging. Realistic goals and meticulous preoperative planning are crucial to achieving the desired outcomes. PURPOSE: To analyse the safety and efficacy of various surgical approaches, and clinical and radiographic outcomes following cervical kyphosis correction.

designRetrospective study. PATIENT SAMPLE: 50 patients with cervical kyphosis who underwent deformity correction between 2008 and 2023 with 24-month follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES: Nurick's grading, mJOA, C2-7 sagittal Cobb angle, C2 slope, and T1 slope.

methodsBaseline patient demographics, surgical characteristics, baseline and follow-up clinical (Nurick grading and mJOA), and radiographic outcome (C2-7 sagittal Cobb angle, C2 slope, and T1 slope) measures were collected from the database on admission and the latest follow-up. Radiographic parameters were studied on CT and cervical spine radiographs to assess stability, the degree of deformity correction, and fusion status at the latest follow-up.

resultsA total of 50 patients with a mean age of 25.2 years were included. The mean kyphotic segment was 3.6. All underwent surgical correction using various approaches. Combined anterior and posterior approach (44%) was the predominant common approach followed by the posterior-only approach (42%). Twenty patients (40%) developed postoperative complications and nine patients (18%) had major Clavien-Dindo complications with a mortality rate of 4% in our cohort. There was a significant change in myelopathy from a baseline mJOA of 11.1-12.6 and a Nurick grade of 3.2-2.6 (p = < 0.01). There was a significant deformity correction with a reduction of kyphosis to the following: mean Cobb angle was 44.4°-9.5° (p = < 0.01), mean C2 slope was 39.1°-12.2° and mean T1 slope was 7.9°-7.9°. The mean follow-up was 75.1 ± 44.6 months. There were no new complaints on the latest follow-up.

conclusionSurgical management of severe cervical kyphosis should prioritize neural decompression, deformity correction, and spinal reconstruction. Surgical correction can achieve radiographic realignment and modest functional improvement, successfully halting neurological progression in most cases. Long-term surveillance remains essential given the prevalence of delayed complications (junctional kyphosis or implant failure).

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraeKyphosisSpinal FusionAdolescentAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiographyRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultCervical kyphosisCombined approachDeformity correctionNurick gradingOutcome assessmentPosterior-only approach

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.