ArticleScientific reports2026
Soil classification in the Sudan Savanna using sentinel products and topographic information with machine learning models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate soil information is crucial for sustainable agricultural planning and land management, particularly in data-scarce regions, such as the Sudan Savanna, the largest sorghum-producing area in Africa. A recent study reported that soils in this region corresponded well with the topography, having formed primarily through erosion-deposition processes, resulting in systematic variation in soil types along the landscape. Therefore, this study compared the performances of three machine learning models, i.e., Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Support Vector Machine (SVM), for soil classification based on multisource remote sensing and topographic data. Ground-truth data with four different soil types, Lixisols, Petric Plinthosols, Pisoplinthic Petric Plinthosols, and Gleysols, were used to train and validate the models using 19 remote sensing-derived covariates including Sentinel-1 SAR, Sentinel-2 bands, spectral indices, and Topographic Wetness Index. Machine learning classification was analyzed under different scenarios of remote sensing feature combination. Results showed that the XGBoost with the selected feature combination achieved the highest performance with an overall accuracy of 78.9%, followed by RF (72.3%) and SVM (65.2%). Among the selected features, topographic parameters appeared the most important and provided complementary information for accurate soil classification. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of integrating optical, radar, and topographic information for soil mapping and provides a valuable management tool to support agricultural and environmental strategies in the Sudan Savanna.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.