Observational studyScientific reports2026
Return to work and cancer survivorship needs of breast cancer survivors: an observational prospective single-cohort study in Italy.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A multidisciplinary intervention to support return to work of individuals with breast cancer: a prospective feasibility study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Because work participation is an important goal of individuals with breast cancer (BC), we aimed to investigate the factors that may influence return to work in employed individuals as well as cancer survivorship needs regardless of employment status. Adult individuals with BC were followed up for 12 months after surgery. The impact of patient characteristics on return to work and needs was explored using penalized generalized linear mixed models. Of the 111 participants, 85 were working age and employed. Having children (odds ratio (OR) 0.81), undergoing lymph node dissection (OR 0.66), having targeted therapy (OR 0.78), and having a physically demanding job (OR 0.64) and a more severe disability of the upper limbs (OR 0.98) seemed to be associated with reduced return to work, as did taking sick days between diagnosis and surgery (OR 0.74) and taking sick leave after surgery (OR 13.78). More severe anxiety (OR 0.66), reduced sleep quality (OR 0.40), and upper limb disability (OR 0.13) seemed associated with higher needs. These findings suggest that employment is shaped by key determinants, whose early identification may help mitigate adverse work outcomes and support the timely addressing of needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.