ArticleScientific reports2026
Classification of anterior cruciate ligament injury profiles through running analysis: a machine learning approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predictive accuracy of machine learning and markerless gait analysis for return-to-sport following lower extremity injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are common in athletes and often result in long-term complications such as altered gait and an increased risk of osteoarthritis. Identifying gait abnormalities after ACL reconstruction is crucial for optimizing rehabilitation. This study investigates the use of machine learning (ML) models to distinguish between athletes with ACL injuries and healthy individuals using spatiotemporal gait data collected during treadmill running. The Classifiers tested include the K-nearest neighbors (KNN), gradient boosting machine (GBM), XGBoost (XGB), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and multilayer perceptron (MLP). KNN demonstrated superior performance, achieving the highest balanced accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score (0.98), with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.99. Feature importance analysis revealed that temporal gait variables, particularly stride time, stance time, swing time, and anterior-posterior velocity, were the most critical predictors across all the models. These findings align with previous research showing post-ACL reconstruction gait changes. ML models, particularly KNN, show strong potential for detecting subtle gait differences, which have important clinical implications. Early detection of re-injury risk and personalized rehabilitation interventions could improve gait coordination and reduce the long-term risk of osteoarthritis associated with ACL injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.