ArticleSkeletal radiology2026
MRI of pediatric meniscal retears following primary arthroscopic surgery: diagnostic accuracy and common findings.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Introduction to the special issue on imaging of the knee.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess MRI's diagnostic accuracy for pediatric meniscal retears and to examine how factors from the primary tear and arthroscopy influence retear patterns. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients who underwent primary arthroscopic meniscal repair or debridement between 2018 and 2024 followed by repeat MRI of the ipsilateral knee for suspected reinjury were included. Data from operative reports, MRI reports, and clinical follow-up were collected to assess the presence and characteristics of retears. MRI images were re-reviewed by two pediatric musculoskeletal radiologists to evaluate meniscal pathology.
results109 suspected meniscal reinjuries were identified among 101 patients (mean age: 16.7 years), with 74 arthroscopically confirmed retears. MRI demonstrated 96% sensitivity and 94% specificity in detecting retears. Retears predominantly involved the posterior horn (54%) and were more likely to be displaced if the primary tear was displaced (54% vs. 33%, p = 0.04). Primary repairs accounted for 70% of retears and 73% of posterior horn retears. Common postoperative MRI findings associated with retears included the presence of displaced meniscal tears and high linear T2 signal within the meniscus repair site. Medial meniscal retears were more common in patients with a ruptured ACL (p = 0.018) on primary arthroscopy, whereas lateral meniscal retears were more common in patients with an intact ACL (p = 0.002) on primary arthroscopy.
conclusionMRI is specific for detecting meniscal retears, but diagnostic challenges remain in nondisplaced tears and in certain regions, such as the posterior horn. Understanding factors that influence meniscal retear patterns may improve postoperative evaluation and management, ultimately improving clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41888258What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.