ArticleScientific reports2026
Imaging improvements reveal guttae development and posterior fibrillar layer formation in fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Guttae are a hallmark of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) and the disease’s progression. A posterior fibrillar layer (PFL) that covers central guttae has been previously described, but its formation and progression remain unclear. This study aims to further investigate the characteristics of guttae and the PFL in FECD. In a well-characterized prospective FECD patient cohort, a total of 43 DMEK (Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty) specimens were immunostained for ZO1 or COL1, flat-mounted, and analyzed using differential interference contrast (DIC), autofluorescence (excited at 480 nm), and polarized light microscopy. Guttae and PFL were quantified and correlated with clinical data. Guttae were visualized by DIC and autofluorescence imaging and classified into two types with gradual transition: peripheral, knob-like guttae and central, flat guttae. Guttae with low autofluorescence often were covered by corneal endothelial cells (CEnC). Central guttae were found to be covered by a PFL that contained COL1 and was visualized using polarized light microscopy. The PFL displayed a fibrous structure that blurred guttae in DIC illumination. Its presence correlated with clinical parameters, such as anterior scatter and post-operative corneal edema resolution providing insight into the relation of PFL and FECD severity. The combination of DIC, autofluorescence, and polarized light microscopy provides a robust method for investigating guttae and the PFL. This could facilitate preoperative assessment of corneal donor tissue and enhance postoperative clinical diagnostics by detailed detection of guttae and PFL in patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.