ArticleScientific reports2026
Influence of programming-pulse properties on weight-update characteristics of charge-trapping IGZO synaptic transistors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A study on the synaptic characteristics dependent on programming-pulse properties, such as the programming pulse width (PPW), of amorphous In-Ga-Zn-O thin-film transistors (a-IGZO TFTs) is presented. To validate this, the weight-update characteristics with respect to PPWs (e.g., 1.5 s, 3 s, and 6 s) are monitored. Here, the memory functionality of a-IGZO TFTs can be achieved with defects (e.g., trap states) in the gate insulator deposited at a low temperature process, leading to the electron trapping or de-trapping phenomena. Based on this function, when the programming pulses with same duty cycle and total time are applied to the gate terminal, the dynamic ratio for PPW = 3 s is found to be 18.5, which is larger compared to other PPWs. This is because the energy per programming-pulse for PPW = 1.5 s is relatively low whereas the recovery during the read process for PPW = 6 s is faster, degrading the weight-update characteristics. In order to fairly compare this recovery effect for each PPW, another pulsed experiment with different duty cycles is conducted maintaining the same number of programming pulses. As a result of the experiment, when the PPW is increased while keeping the same recovery condition, it is found to be a larger dynamic ratio due to a higher energy per programming pulse. With results of this device level, the analog AI accelerator simulation is also performed monitoring the recognition accuracy for three PPW cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.