ArticleScientific reports2026
A hybrid RSM-spherical fuzzy WASPAS framework for robust tribological optimization of directionally rolled copper rods under manufacturing uncertainty.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A hybrid RSM-Spherical Fuzzy AHP-Fuzzy VIKOR approach for optimizing drilling of AM60 magnesium alloy using biodegradable MQL.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study develops a robust hybrid optimization framework to enhance the tribological performance of directionally rolled copper rods for sustainable, defect-free micro-cup production under uncertain manufacturing conditions, where conflicting responses and imprecise decision environments constrain conventional optimization approaches. A face-centered Central Composite Design (CCD) was employed to investigate the effects of four critical process parameters-applied load (400-800 N), sliding speed (2-6 rpm), sliding distance (20-60 m), and draw ratio (1.69-3.09). Six key tribological responses, namely wear rate, coefficient of friction, material loss, frictional force, wear scar diameter, and temperature rise, were modeled using Response Surface Methodology (RSM). Model adequacy and robustness were rigorously validated through ANOVA, adjusted and predicted R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.