Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41888234›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Development of a spontaneous disease diagnosis tool by executing an enhanced convolutional neural network model for citrus fruits and leaves.

R Arunapriya, S P Valli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

R ArunapriyaB S Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, 600 048, Tamilnadu, India.
S P ValliB S Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, 600 048, Tamilnadu, India. vallisp@crescent.education.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oranges, mandarins, bitter oranges, and lemons are examples of citrus fruits that make delicious meals and are highly nutritious. Citrus fruits suffer from a variety of infections that affect their yield. The Department of Agriculture wants to increase the production of oranges and lemons. On the other hand, several plant diseases and their advanced stages have impacted production. The quality of fruit influences market value and its financial effect. Therefore, accurate detection of ailments and their severity is crucial for improving the output and market value of oranges and lemons. To automatically evaluate and predict diseases in citrus leaves and fruits, this paper has proposed a modified convolutional neural network (ICNN) model. Python is used to create the ICNN model, and testing is performed using benchmark datasets from various repositories. The research presented here shows that ICNN performs better than traditional deep learning and machine learning models, such as the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN). This illustrates how machine learning models require supplementary approaches to extract parameters from data that arrives in non-automated ways. Additionally, to improve the accuracy of their classification or prediction, deep learning models require pre-trained models. As a result, ICNN, an enhanced deep learning model that can automatically predict disease with higher accuracy than other models, represents an advancement over standard CNNs. Compared with KNN and CNN, ICNN achieves 99.69% accuracy.

Indexed as

CitrusFruitPlant DiseasesPlant LeavesClassification AlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksDeep LearningMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerPredictive Learning ModelsAccurate detection and ailmentsCitrus fruitsConvolutional neural networkDeep learningDisease predictionICNNK-Nearest neighbourMachine learningMandarins

Identifiers

PMID41888234
PMCPMC13172317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.