ArticleScientific reports2026
A behaviourally informed digital framework for safety culture transformation in the oil and gas industry.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Occupational safety within the oil and gas industry continues to face persistent behavioural and cultural challenges despite advances in engineering and management systems. Many existing digital safety systems are primarily structured around compliance-oriented functions, such as incident reporting, audit documentation, and checklist monitoring, with comparatively limited integration of behavioural reinforcement mechanisms and user engagement strategies. This study presents a behaviourally informed digital intervention framework for safety culture transformation, operationalised through the Behavioural Occupational Safety Culture Application (BOSCA). Using a six-step framework grounded in behavioural-change theory, BOSCA's architecture was structured into four layers; Application, Control, Security & Integration, and Data Storage each ensuring secure, real-time interaction between users and the backend system. System functionality validation demonstrated stable performance, with accurate data processing, reliable notification triggering, and secure data handling observed under simulated operational conditions. Usability testing involving ten industry practitioners indicated high user acceptance, with participants reporting clear interface navigation, intuitive module integration, and effective motivational feedback mechanisms that supported continuous engagement. The BOSCA model represents a scalable digital framework that bridges behavioural science with safety management, transitioning from reactive compliance toward proactive, data-driven behavioural engagement in high-risk industrial environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.