Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41888230›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A sustainable hybrid FEA-AI optimization framework for multistage deep drawing of unidirectionally rolled copper micro-cups.

S P Sundar Singh Sivam, Stalin Kesavan, A Johnson Santhosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S P Sundar Singh SivamDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, 603203, Tamil Nadu, India. legendsundar2k6@gmail.com.
Stalin KesavanDepartment of Marine Engineering, Amet University, East Coast Road, Kanathur, Chennai, 603 112, India.
A Johnson SanthoshFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Jimma Institute of Technology, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia. johnson.antony@ju.edu.et.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precision micro-cups for electronic and medical applications require stringent control of resultant tool force (RTF) and spring-back (SB) to prevent defects, excessive tool loading, and material waste. However, conventional micro deep-drawing processes remain reliant on costly trial-and-error experimentation and exhibit limited predictive reliability under severe plastic deformation and rolling-induced anisotropy. To address this challenge, a robust and computationally reproducible optimization framework is developed for sustainable, high-volume manufacturing. Multistage deep drawing of unidirectionally rolled copper strips subjected to 200% thickness reduction (true strain − 2.78) is investigated using validated finite element modeling (FEM), with clearance (C), punch nose radius (PNR), and coefficient of friction (µ) systematically varied through a Central Composite Design. The resulting FEM-generated dataset is used to train predictive models based on Response Surface Methodology (RSM), Levenberg–Marquardt artificial neural networks (LM-ANN), and Bayesian Regularized artificial neural networks (BR-ANN). Experimental trials are conducted independently for model validation and performance assessment, ensuring that the ANN models are FEM-trained and experimentally validated rather than experimentally trained. These predictive models are integrated with a Genetic Algorithm (GA) for global optimization of RTF and SB. Model performance is evaluated using R², RMSE, MAPE, MSRE, and Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) for both seen (simulation-based) and unseen (experimental) datasets. The BR-ANN–GA framework demonstrates superior predictive accuracy and robustness, identifying optimal parameters of C = 0.57, PNR = 2, and µ = 0.10, minimizing RTF and SB. Prediction errors are limited to 0.35% (RTF) and 0.41% (SB) for FEM-trained data, while experimental validation trials maintain low errors of 1.7% and 2.68%, respectively, outperforming FEM, RSM, and LM-ANN approaches. Although the study is constrained to axisymmetric geometries and unidirectionally rolled copper, the proposed FEM-trained and experimentally validated BR-ANN–GA framework significantly enhances predictive reliability while reducing energy consumption, material waste, and experimental cost, offering a scalable optimization methodology for precision micro deep drawing.

Indexed as

Bayesian regularized ANNGenetic algorithmMicro deep drawingProcess optimizationResultant tool forceSpring-backSustainable manufacturing

Identifiers

PMID41888230
PMCPMC13194860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.