ArticleScientific reports2026
VMD-LSTM based water level prediction of aquifer in mining working face.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In China, mine water disasters occur frequently, and the accurate prediction of aquifer water level has become an important guarantee for the safe and efficient exploitation of coal resources. In order to improve the accuracy of mine aquifer water level prediction, according to the characteristics of fluctuation and time sequence of aquifer water level in mining face, the vmd-lstm model, which has controllable parameters, strong robustness and is suitable for non-stationary signals, and the long-term and short-term memory network (LSTM), which has stronger capture ability in long-term dependence, is combined to study its effect on aquifer water level prediction in mining face, and compared with the control model. The results show that the vmd-lstm model has the best evaluation results, and its MAE, RMSE, MAPE and R2 indexes are 0.028, 0.035 m/d, 0.007% and 0.96 respectively, each metric achieved improvements of at least 28.2, 41.7, 30.0, and 7.9% compared to other models, which has the highest prediction accuracy and has obvious advantages in predicting large changes; The indicators of vmd-lstm model, vmd-gru model and vmd-rnn model are better than their single LSTM model, GRU model and RNN model, indicating that the decomposition and extraction of aquifer water level characteristic information by VMD method plays a great role in improving the accuracy of aquifer water level prediction; Compared with Gru model and RNN model, the indicators of LSTM model show significant advantages, indicating that LSTM model is more suitable for capturing aquifer water level time series information in long-term dependence. In conclusion, vmd-lstm model has high prediction accuracy and simple structure, which can be used as a convenient aquifer water level prediction model for mine water disaster prevention and control, and plays a certain role in ensuring mine safety production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.