ArticleScientific reports2026
The effect of switching from ribociclib to palbociclib due to toxicity in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: a real-world, multicenter, retrospective study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The standards of care for hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer are CDK 4/6 (cyclin-dependent kinase) inhibitors. Treatment-related toxicity may develop, leading to a switch between CDK 4/6 inhibitors. This study aimed to investigate the effect of switching from ribociclib to palbociclib on prognosis. Forty-four patients were included in the retrospective, multicenter study. Toxicity causes, Drug-Drug Interactions (DDI), Objective Response Rates (ORR), and Discontinuation Free Survival (DFS) were examined. All patients were female, with a median age of 57 (50.25-67.5). De novo metastatic disease was present in 30 (68.2%) patients, and 33 (75%) patients were postmenopausal. The most common reason for the switch was an increase in alanine aminotransferase in 16 patients (36.3%). The median (m) time to switching was 4.3 months, and the median follow-up period was 23.9 months. There was no statistically significant difference between DDI and switch time, p = 0.118. The ORR was 70.9% in those treated with ribociclib before toxicity and 73.1% after switching. In patients treated with ribociclib in the first line, mDFS1 + DFS2 was 31.6 (23.6-39.6) months in those who switched < 4.3 months (n:18), while in those who switched ≥ 4.3 months (n:16), mDFS1 + DFS2 was 25.5 (20.1-31) months, p = 0.618. Time-dependent Cox regression analysis revealed that the timing of the switch did not affect the prognosis. In HR-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, no statistically significant negative association was observed in terms of survival and prognosis when switching from ribociclib to palbociclib after toxicity. Switching may be considered in selected patients during the treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.