Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41888167›Full record

ArticleScientific data2026

An AI-ready remote sensing dataset for high-resolution forest disturbance mapping.

Enmanuel Rodríguez-Paulino, Johannes Stoffels, Martin Schlerf, Achim Röder, Alexander Wagner, Thomas Udelhoven

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Enmanuel Rodríguez-PaulinoRemote Sensing and Natural Resources Modelling Group, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), Belvaux, 41, rue du Brill, Luxembourg, L-4422, Germany. enmanuel.rodpau@gmail.com.
Johannes StoffelsEarth Observation and Climate Processes, Trier University, Behringstr. 21, Trier, 54286, Germany.
Martin SchlerfRemote Sensing and Natural Resources Modelling Group, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), Belvaux, 41, rue du Brill, Luxembourg, L-4422, Germany.
Achim RöderEarth Observation and Climate Processes, Trier University, Behringstr. 21, Trier, 54286, Germany.
Alexander WagnerForschungsanstalt für Waldökologie und Forstwirtschaft, Landesforsten Rheinland-Pfalz, Hauptstraße 16, Trippstadt, 67705, Germany.
Thomas UdelhovenEarth Observation and Climate Processes, Trier University, Behringstr. 21, Trier, 54286, Germany.

Funding

Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg 14585931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Europe's forests face increasing threats from natural disturbances such as insect outbreaks, pathogens, and windthrow, often aggravated by extreme weather events and followed by subsequent salvage logging. Monitoring these events at high spatial detail is essential for forest management and climate adaptation, yet many remain undetected when using medium-resolution satellite imagery, and manual reporting by authorities is time-consuming and inconsistent. Here we present a high-resolution, deep learning-ready dataset designed for the classification of forest disturbance types. It consists of ~17,500 image patches (500 × 500 pixels at 0.2 m resolution) derived from digital orthophotos of Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany. Each patch includes five channels (red, green, blue, near-infrared, and object height) and a segmentation mask with labeled disturbance classes such as bark beetle damage, clear-cuts, and windthrow. To demonstrate its utility, we apply a deep learning model and assess the contribution of individual channels through ablation analysis. The model achieved an overall accuracy of 88.2%, with near-infrared and object height identified as the most informative channels. The dataset offers a high-resolution resource for advancing deep learning-based forest disturbance monitoring.

Indexed as

Deep LearningForestryForestsRemote Sensing TechnologyAnimalsAnthropogenic EffectsGermany

Identifiers

PMID41888167
PMCPMC13031536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.