ArticleScientific data2026
An AI-ready remote sensing dataset for high-resolution forest disturbance mapping.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An AI-ready remote sensing dataset for high-resolution forest disturbance mapping.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Europe's forests face increasing threats from natural disturbances such as insect outbreaks, pathogens, and windthrow, often aggravated by extreme weather events and followed by subsequent salvage logging. Monitoring these events at high spatial detail is essential for forest management and climate adaptation, yet many remain undetected when using medium-resolution satellite imagery, and manual reporting by authorities is time-consuming and inconsistent. Here we present a high-resolution, deep learning-ready dataset designed for the classification of forest disturbance types. It consists of ~17,500 image patches (500 × 500 pixels at 0.2 m resolution) derived from digital orthophotos of Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany. Each patch includes five channels (red, green, blue, near-infrared, and object height) and a segmentation mask with labeled disturbance classes such as bark beetle damage, clear-cuts, and windthrow. To demonstrate its utility, we apply a deep learning model and assess the contribution of individual channels through ablation analysis. The model achieved an overall accuracy of 88.2%, with near-infrared and object height identified as the most informative channels. The dataset offers a high-resolution resource for advancing deep learning-based forest disturbance monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.