ReviewNPJ systems biology and applications2026
From FAIR to CURE: guidelines for computational models of biological systems.
Review in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- TabularQual: A spreadsheet-based format for annotating and curating logical models in SBML-qual.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Digital twins to accelerate target identification and drug development for immune-mediated disorders.FEBS open bio · 2026Review
- The Application of Metabolomics in Frailty: Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions.Metabolites · 2026Review
- Knowledge preservation in the era of big science and AI: strategies for sustainable scientific research.Nature communications · 2026Review
- Integrating AI, mechanistic modelling and network approaches in systems biology for translational research.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- A standardized workflow for kinetic metabolic model curation and dissemination.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- SCSEQ: A web tool for analyzing single-cell RNA-seq data.GigaScience · 2026Article
- BioModels' model of the year 2024.Frontiers in systems biology · 2026Article
- Digital Twins for Personalized Medicine Require Epidemiological Data and Mathematical Modeling: Viewpoint.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Enhanced beta power emerges from simulated parkinsonian primary motor cortex.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2025Article
- Enhanced beta power emerges from simulated parkinsonian primary motor cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Computational modelling of biological systems now and then: revisiting tools and visions from the beginning of the century.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025Review
- MxlPy-Python package for mechanistic learning and hybrid modelling in life science.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- Biotechnology systems engineering: preparing the next generation of bioengineers.Frontiers in systems biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
54 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Guidelines for managing scientific data have been established under the FAIR principles, requiring that data be Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable. In many scientific disciplines, especially computational biology, both data and models are key to progress. For this reason, and recognizing that such models are a very special type of "data", we argue that computational models, especially mechanistic models prevalent in medicine, physiology and systems biology, deserve a complementary set of guidelines. We propose the CURE principles, emphasizing that models should be Credible, Understandable, Reproducible, and Extensible. We delve into each principle, discussing verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification for model credibility; the clarity of model descriptions and annotations for understandability; adherence to standards and open science practices for reproducibility; and the use of open standards and modular code for extensibility and reuse. We outline recommended and baseline requirements for each aspect of CURE, aiming to enhance the impact and trustworthiness of computational models, particularly in biomedical applications where credibility is paramount. Our perspective underscores the need for a more disciplined approach to modeling, aligning with emerging trends such as Digital Twins and emphasizing the importance of data and modeling standards for interoperability and reuse. Finally, we emphasize that given the non-trivial effort required to implement the guidelines, the community should strive to automate as many of the guidelines as possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.