ArticleScientific reports2026
Predictive accuracy of clinical, laboratory, and radiological scores for severe acute pancreatitis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a serious and common medical emergency with major effects on morbidity and mortality. We tried to assess different scores in early prediction of severe AP. The current study was conducted between October 2018 and October 2022 to enroll all patients with acute AP. A total of 300 patients with AP were enrolled in the study. All patients were subjected to thorough history taking and clinical evaluation. The following scores were calculated; modified Ranson criteria (mRC) score at admission, mRC score at 48 h after admission, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Examination-II score that consists of the following parameters (APACHE-II), Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP) Score, Harmless Acute Pancreatitis (HAP) score, Computed tomography severity index (CTSI), neutrophil/lymphocytes ratio (NLR) and platelets/lymphocytes ratio (PLR). Mean age of enrolled patients was 49.50 years with range between 24 and 71 years old. Majority (66.7%) of patients was males. A total of 100 (33.3%) patients had severe AP (SAP). Predictors of SAP were NLR, PLR, mRC (after 48 h), HAP score, BISAP score and severe CTSI. CTSI and BISAP score have the best diagnostic accuracy (100% and 96.4%, respectively) followed by NLR (79%), PLR (65.9%) and mRC after 48 h (62.2%). AP still has mild course in majority of cases but SAP has serious outcome. Early recognition of patients who vulnerable to SAP may improve their outcome. BISAP and CTSI are better scores for prediction of SAP. Multi-centers studies are warranted with longer duration of follow up. Also, more studies are required to standardize CT timing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.