ArticleNature communications2026
A metrological foundation for absolute transcriptomics using International System of Units-anchored calibrators.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence needs a common ruler.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2026Article
- A metrological foundation for absolute transcriptomics using International System of Units-anchored calibrators.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RNA-sequencing's conversion of molecules to reads is inconsistent. Experiment-to-experiment variations (systemic bias) create batch effects, while gene-to-gene variations (sequence-dependent bias) invalidate inter-gene comparisons, precluding a universal scale. This confines analysis to relative fold-changes, a metric unreliable across batches. We introduce TranScale: 100 biomimetic standards with SI-traceable concentrations certified by Isotope Dilution Mass Spectrometry. Co-processed within samples, they empirically characterize systemic and sequence-dependent biases, generating a library-specific calibration curve (R² > 0.97) to convert reads into absolute quantities. This approach reveals that consistent fold-changes can mask severe absolute errors, exposing systemic biases missed by conventional QC. Across laboratories, this calibration reduced median inter-lab CV from >85% to <25% and increased biological signal-to-noise from ~0 to >7.9, outperforming the widely-used tool ComBat. By anchoring RNA-seq to the SI, our work establishes the metrological foundation for data interoperability and universal benchmarks, enabling absolute comparisons of SI-traceable quantities between any two genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.