Trial reportThe European respiratory journal2026
Nerandomilast in progressive pulmonary fibrosis: data from the whole follow-up period of the FIBRONEER-ILD trial.
Trial report in The European respiratory journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the FIBRONEER-ILD trial in patients with progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF), nerandomilast 9 mg twice daily and 18 mg twice daily (hereafter nerandomilast 9 mg and 18 mg, respectively) reduced the decline in forced vital capacity at week 52 compared with placebo (primary end-point). We assessed the effects of nerandomilast up to the final database lock.
methodsTime to first acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease, hospitalisation for respiratory cause or death (key secondary end-point) and other time-to-event end-points were assessed.
results1176 patients, of whom 512 were taking background nintedanib, received nerandomilast or placebo. At the final database lock, the mean±sd exposure to trial medication was 15.1±5.7 months and the mean±sd observation period was 17.0±4.1 months. Compared with placebo, the hazard ratio for the key secondary end-point was 0.78 (95% CI 0.61-1.00) for nerandomilast 9 mg and 0.77 (95% CI 0.60-0.99) for nerandomilast 18 mg; hazard ratios were lower among patients not taking nintedanib (0.69 (95% CI 0.49-0.97) and 0.65 (95% CI 0.46-0.92), respectively) than among those taking background nintedanib (0.90 (95% CI 0.63-1.30) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.65-1.34), respectively). For death, the hazard ratio
conclusionsIn the FIBRONEER-ILD trial in patients with PPF, nerandomilast reduced the risk of clinically important outcomes, including death, over the whole trial. Nerandomilast had a favourable safety and tolerability profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.