ArticleBMJ open2026
Patient perceptions of inhaled asthma medications: a qualitative study in Northern Sri Lanka.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study explores perceptions of inhaled medications among patients with asthma at an outpatient tertiary care setting in Northern Sri Lanka.
designA descriptive qualitative research design was used to gather data through focus group discussions (FGDs) that were transcribed, translated, manually coded and thematically analysed using Braun and Clarke's six-step approach.
settingThe study was conducted at an outpatient medical clinic at a tertiary care centre in Northern Sri Lanka.
participantsSix FGDs were carried out among adult patients with asthma who had been on inhaled medications for at least 3 months. Participants were selected by maximum variation sampling, with each FGD consisting of 6-10 participants.
results51 participants between the ages of 20 and 71 years were recruited; 36 (70.6%) were female, and about a fourth had primary education or less. Seven subthemes were drawn out and organised into three overarching themes: (1) inhaler hesitancy; (2) fear-driven adherence and (3) conviction at last. Most participants were initially reluctant to use inhalers, primarily due to concerns about dependency and side effects, often influenced by opinions of family members. They delayed use until they experienced severe symptoms, with some describing nebulisation, hospitalisation and fear of death as turning points. Symptom alleviation and improved quality of life led to better adherence.
conclusionsDelays in inhaler use could lead to poor asthma control and outcomes. As many patients reported using their inhalers more consistently after an exacerbation or hospitalisation, asthma education programmes, involving both patients and family members, could address context-specific beliefs and misconceptions to promote early and sustained adherence to inhaled medications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.