ArticleBMJ open2026
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of school meals programmes on education, health and nutrition, social protection and agriculture in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGlobally, school meals programmes (SMPs), otherwise referred to as school feeding programmes, are widely implemented with the aim of improving multisectoral outcomes, including education, health and nutrition, social protection and agriculture, among other cross-cutting impact areas. Despite their widespread adoption and the broad recognition of their potential benefits, evidence on their actual impact across these diverse outcomes remains limited, fragmented and often inconclusive. This lack of consolidated and robust evidence has prompted growing interest from development and humanitarian agencies, practitioners and policymakers in generating high-quality data to inform the design, implementation and scaling of these interventions. Therefore, to address this gap, we plan to conduct a systematic review aimed at assessing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of SMPs on outcomes related to education, health and nutrition, social protection and agriculture in low-income and middle-income countries. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A comprehensive literature search will be conducted on relevant studies published between 2007 and 2025. The study will focus on four primary outcomes, which will include education, health and nutrition, social protection and agriculture. This systematic review will align with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We will search seven databases: MEDLINE (via Ovid), Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase (via Ovid), PubMed and Global Health (via Ovid) using predefined keywords. The risk of bias of randomised and non-randomised studies will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the Risk of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions tool, respectively. Two reviewers will independently select studies, extract data and assess risk of bias. All included studies will be summarised and meta-analyses will be conducted when appropriate. Heterogeneity will be assessed using the I² statistic, subgroup analyses and meta-regression. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND DISSEMINATION: This study will not involve the collection of primary data and will thus not require any ethical approval. The dissemination of the outcome of the study will be through global conferences, policy briefs and scientific journals. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024628180.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.