Observational studyBMJ open2026
What practical strategies improve recruitment and engagement of people experiencing homelessness in observational clinical research? A multistudy synthesis from Dublin, Ireland.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to identify practical, trauma-informed strategies to improve engagement of populations experiencing homelessness in observational health research.
designData from three real-world observational studies involving people experiencing homelessness (PEH) and housed participants were analysed for study completion rates and participant demographics. A team of researchers, clinicians and people with lived experience of homelessness, reviewed their experience of study design, recruitment and assessment study procedures to identify strategies found to be effective in recruitment and retention of PEH.
settingThe Inclusion Health Research Group (IHRG) consists of 10 clinicians and researchers who study the effect of social exclusion, such as homelessness, on health. Many members of the group also provide clinical care to PEH. The three observational studies which informed this paper recruited participants in Dublin, Ireland between 2021 and 2025. Approximately 15 000 adults are currently experiencing homelessness in Ireland, of whom two-thirds reside in Dublin and more than 70% are accommodated in hostels.
participantsThe three observational studies that informed this paper, designed and carried out by members of the IHRG, included populations of PEH recruited from sites in the community across Dublin.
resultsPEH were predominantly male with an average age in their mid-40s and a high prevalence of smoking, drug use and alcohol consumption. Study completion rates were high (83.3% to 94.1%). On review of the study design and implementation, eight key strategies were identified as effective in recruitment and retention of PEH: (1) involvement of people with lived experience in study design; (2) flexible recruitment locations; (3) flexible assessment timings; (4) trust-building through consistent communication; (5) collaboration with gatekeeper organisations and peer advocates; (6) use of non-financial incentives like health screenings; (7) validated assessment tools and (8) tailored support for participants with addiction.
conclusionsUsing flexible, trauma-informed, participant-centred approaches informed by the involvement of people with lived experience and gatekeeper organisations can ensure high levels of recruitment and retention of PEH. This may enhance research inclusivity and ultimately contribute to better understanding of the complex health needs of populations experiencing homelessness within public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.