ReviewNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2026
Advancing resilience science through cross-domain integration: Proceedings of an NIH workshop.
Review in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Dietary Supplements hosted a workshop titled Advancing the Biomedical Science of Resilience: A Discussion of Measures and Metrics on September 24-25, 2024. The workshop convened NIH program staff and researchers from academia and federal agencies to propose and identify measures and metrics that capture protective factors contributing to resilience across the lifespan. Various perspectives on resilience were thoroughly discussed, including those related to cellular, physiological, psychosocial, community, and environmental domains, reflecting the complexity and multidimensionality of resilience science. Central to the workshop were discussions to examine characteristics of resilience studies across domains and to explore outcome-specific measures and metrics and study designs needed to validate those outcomes and accurately measure resilience in biomedical research. The workshop concluded with a panel discussion on the challenges of advancing the science of resilience and the need for robust frameworks for studying the concept. This article presents the proceedings from that workshop and outlines strategies for advancing and strengthening the science of resilience through greater integration across research domains. Leadership in convening diverse perspectives and fostering multidisciplinary dialogue, such as through consensus-building activities and collaborative forums, will be important for advancing shared frameworks and understanding resilience across the lifespan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.