ArticleCell genomics2026
Balancing off-target and on-target considerations for optimized CRISPR-Cas9 knockout library design.
Article in Cell genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimized parameters for CRISPR-Cas9 interference library design.Cell genomics · 2026Article
- Toward transgenic multicellular parasites: CRISPR-Cas12a germline editing ofScience advances · 2026Article
- On-target and off-target activities of CRISPR therapeutics across scales.Trends in biotechnology · 2026Review
- Region-Level Design and Analysis of CRISPR Perturbation Screens with FRACTEL.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A one-week automated genome-wide optical pooled screen using OttoSeq.Genome biology · 2026Article
- The one-week automated genome-wide optical pooled screen.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Scaling perturbations: beyond genome-scale CRISPR screens.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The continued development of high-dimensional CRISPR screen readouts, such as single-cell RNA sequencing and high-content imaging, necessitates compact libraries to enable functional interrogation at genome scale. Improved genome annotations cause library deprecation over time, further motivating an updated genome-wide design effort. Additionally, while on-target efficacy and off-target avoidance are often optimized in isolation, we lack a robust framework for simultaneously weighing and balancing these competing priorities. Here, we present a selection strategy that identifies guides with sufficient off-target activity to justify omission from the library, thus avoiding the unnecessary exclusion of active guides, allowing the inclusion of those with maximal on-target activity. We create, validate, and make available to the community the Jacquere library for knockout screens of the human genome, as well as its mouse counterpart, Julianna, to facilitate gene function discovery at scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.