Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41887211›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2026

Leveraging experimental vasculature data for high-resolution brain tumor simulations.

Eric Behle, Julian Herold, Alexander Schug

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eric BehleJülich Supercomputing Centre, Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
Julian HeroldScientific Computing Center, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
Alexander SchugJülich Supercomputing Centre, Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. Electronic address: alexander.schug@kit.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer remains a leading cause of mortality. Multidisciplinary studies probe its complex pathology to increase treatment options. Computational modeling of tumor growth on high-performance computing resources offers microscopic insight into its progress and a valuable avenue for advancing our understanding. However, the effective initialization and parameterization of the underlying models require high-resolution data from real tissue structures. Here, we leveraged high-performance computing resources and a massive data set of a mouse brain's entire vascular network. We processed these image stacks into detailed three-dimensional representations, identified brain regions of interest, and conducted a series of large-scale simulations to investigate how tumor growth is influenced by local vascular network characteristics. By simulating tumor growth with subcellular resolution, we can probe to which extent vessel density and vessel network length influence tumor growth. We determined that vessel density is more likely to affect the growth rate than the network length. Finally, our results allowed us to extrapolate tumor cell growth predictions for the entire mouse brain, highlighting the critical role of vascular topology in tumor progression. Such increasingly realistic simulations of cancer cells and their microenvironment enable researchers to increasingly bridge the gap between basic biology and clinical practice, ultimately supporting the development of more effective personalized cancer therapies.

Indexed as

Blood VesselsBrain NeoplasmsComputer SimulationModels, BiologicalNeovascularization, PathologicAnimalsBrainCell ProliferationMice

Identifiers

PMID41887211
PMCPMC13351720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.