Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41887207›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2026

Membrane-Free Polymer-Based Faradaic Deionization System for Enhanced Desalination.

Alba Fombona-Pascual, Jayaruwan G Gamaethiralalage, Louis C P M de Smet, Jesús Palma, Julio J Lado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alba Fombona-PascualImdea Energía, Avd. Ramón de la Sagra, 3, Móstoles, Madrid 28935, Spain.
Jayaruwan G GamaethiralalageAdvanced Interfaces & Materials, Laboratory of Organic Chemistry, Wageningen University, Stippeneng 4, Wageningen 6708 WE, The Netherlands.
Louis C P M de SmetAdvanced Interfaces & Materials, Laboratory of Organic Chemistry, Wageningen University, Stippeneng 4, Wageningen 6708 WE, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7252-4047
Jesús PalmaImdea Energía, Avd. Ramón de la Sagra, 3, Móstoles, Madrid 28935, Spain.
Julio J LadoImdea Energía, Avd. Ramón de la Sagra, 3, Móstoles, Madrid 28935, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1208-1250

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of cost-effective and energy-efficient water desalination technologies remains a critical challenge, particularly for treating brackish water. Herein, we present a membrane-free, dual-polymer electrochemical deionization system that leverages the complementary ion selectivities of polyaniline chloride (PAni-Cl) and poly(naphthalene diimide-ethylenediamine) (PNDIE) to achieve simultaneous sodium and chloride ion removal. By eliminating ion-exchange membranes and utilizing a simple separator, the proposed system minimizes operational complexity and cost while maintaining efficient ionic transport. Initially, the electropolymerized PAni-Cl buckypaper electrode exhibited enhanced electronic conductivity and remarkable cycling stability, retaining 84% of its initial performance after 800 cycles (15 days of operation). Comparative evaluation of three cell architectures, a symmetric CDI cell, a hybrid YP80F//PNDIE cell, and a full polymer-based cell, revealed that the dual-polymer configuration outperforms conventional setups, attaining a salt removal capacity of up to 64 mg·g

Indexed as

Water PurificationAniline CompoundsElectrodesPolymersSodium ChlorideAniline CompoundsPolymersSodium Chloridedual-ion selectivityfaradaic deionizationfull-cellmembrane-freePAni-ClPNDIE

Identifiers

PMID41887207
PMCPMC13063419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.