Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41887170›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2026

Abnormal expression pattern of knock-in marker in Eimeria tenella using CRISPR/Cas9.

Yanzhen Liao, Lin Liang, Ruiying Liang, Jiabo Ding, Dandan Hu, Hongbin Si, Xingju Song, Xinming Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yanzhen LiaoCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Guangxi 541000, China; Key Laboratory of Animal Biosafety Risk Prevention and Control (North) & Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biological Products and Chemical Drugs of MARA, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Lin LiangKey Laboratory of Animal Biosafety Risk Prevention and Control (North) & Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biological Products and Chemical Drugs of MARA, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Ruiying LiangKey Laboratory of Animal Biosafety Risk Prevention and Control (North) & Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biological Products and Chemical Drugs of MARA, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Jiabo DingKey Laboratory of Animal Biosafety Risk Prevention and Control (North) & Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biological Products and Chemical Drugs of MARA, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Dandan HuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Guangxi 541000, China.
Hongbin SiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Guangxi 541000, China.
Xingju SongCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Guangxi 541000, China.
Xinming TangKey Laboratory of Animal Biosafety Risk Prevention and Control (North) & Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biological Products and Chemical Drugs of MARA, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China. Electronic address: tangxinming@caas.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene editing technology has been widely applied in the genetic manipulation of many organisms and is increasingly being utilized in eukaryotic pathogens. However, its efficiency often requires improvement. In our study using CRISPR/Cas9 to genetically manipulate Eimeria tenella, we aimed to insert a tag into a target gene locus via homologous recombination, but observed outcomes inconsistent with expectations. Whole-genome sequencing analysis of the integration sites revealed that the transgenic E. tenella did not exhibit correct targeted integration. These results indicate that creating double-strand breaks (DSB) at specific genomic sites to trigger homology-directed repair (HDR) for gene modification can lead to mislocalized expression. This study provides insights for utilizing CRISPR/Cas9 technology in genetic editing, particularly in E. tenella, and offers suggestions for improving strategies that employ the co-transfection of multiple plasmids, such as Cas9-gRNA and donor plasmids.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsEimeria tenellaGene EditingGene Knock-In TechniquesAnimalsChickensCRISPR/Cas9Insertion siteMicroneme protein 2Rhoptry protein 35Vaccine vector

Identifiers

PMID41887170
PMCPMC13052019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.