ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2026
"I Hope It Does Not Stop With Me, and That It Continues With Other Patients" - A 360 Degree Qualitative Assessment of mHealth Follow-up in Cameroon.
Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Communication Barriers in Patient-Provider Interactions in Health Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDespite a high burden of injury, routine follow-up for trauma patients in Cameroon is limited by resource constraints. Previously, we implemented a mobile phone health (mHealth) triage intervention to identify patients who warrant reevaluation. While feasible and acceptable, only 57% of patients were successfully contacted 2 wk postdischarge. To optimize patient participation in this promising, low-cost intervention, we evaluated participant perceptions.
methodsResearch assistants, trauma providers, and trauma patients involved in mHealth follow-up were recruited through purposive random sampling. Semistructured, in-depth interviews were conducted between October 2023 and March 2024. Interviews were performed until thematic saturation was achieved. Qualitative data analysis was completed using grounded theory and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
resultsThirty interviews were conducted with five research assistants, 10 trauma providers and 15 patients. Three themes emerged that spanned the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research domains. First, persistent gaps in initial engagement with mHealth stem from the compounding negative effects of poor socioeconomic status and injury. Second, mHealth can improve patient perceptions of their health care experience through the positive emotional and psychological benefits reported from the communication with the research assistants. Third, clear expectations for subsequent communication may mitigate mistrust and improve patient participation.
conclusionsTo optimize mHealth participation we should explore the positive relationships formed between the research assistants and patients during patients' hospital stay and through continued follow-up after discharge. Creative solutions to supplement mHealth follow-up of trauma patients via phone can and should be investigated to reach the individuals most affected by postinjury morbidity and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.