ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2026
Beyond Compliance: Understanding the Role of Peer Review Through a Theory of Change.
Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePeer review is a widely used mechanism to support quality improvement in healthcare, yet its effectiveness remains uncertain. This study aims to examine how peer review visits contribute to care quality improvement in NHS England's specialised commissioned services, and to develop a theory of change that explains their mechanisms of action.
methodsA theory-based evaluation was undertaken using qualitative methods. Data were collected in two phases: (1) 17 semi-structured interviews with peer reviewers, NHS staff, commissioners, and patient representatives; and (2) two stakeholder workshops with directors of nursing and service commissioners. Thematic analysis using deductive coding was guided by the Impact Domain Framework. Findings were synthesised into a logic model and Theory of Change, visualised using Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs), incorporating relational dimensions of peer review.
resultsAnalysis of transcripts from a diverse range of stakeholders produced four core themes: the tension between compliance and learning objectives; the role of trust and relational dynamics; limited mechanisms for knowledge exchange; and a lack of follow-up impeding sustained improvement. The final Theory of Change model distinguishes between compliance-driven and learning-driven pathways, integrating relational factors such as trust and engagement as key enablers of improvement.
conclusionPeer review visits are more effective when perceived as opportunities for learning rather than compliance monitoring. The study offers a novel Theory of Change and visual model to guide future evaluation and practice, emphasising the importance of relational dynamics and sustained follow-up. These insights should inform both implementation and policy by supporting a shift toward trust-based, developmental peer review models that strengthen organisational learning and align with the goals of a learning health system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.