ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026
Getting It Out There: Reflections on the Process and Impact of Public Engagement Activities in a Study on End-of-Life Care Planning With People With Intellectual Disabilities.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMany tools and interventions developed from research projects are not properly implemented in health and social care practice. Engaging with stakeholders is an important part of the implementation process when developing, sharing and embedding new tools. The Victoria & Stuart Project was a 2-year project that co-designed a toolkit of resources and approaches to support end-of-life care planning for people with intellectual disabilities. It had an inclusively delivered dissemination and engagement workstream to raise awareness of the toolkit throughout the project. In this paper, we describe and reflect on the project's public 'inspiring and informing' engagement activities.
methodsEngagement activities included a project website, weekly blog and newsletter. The project held webinars and was promoted on various social media platforms. One-to-one stakeholder consultations with all members of the project's Research Advisory Group were held. Presentations were given to both academic and non-academic audiences.
resultsEngagement activities were labour-intensive and time-consuming, particularly when creating regular content such as weekly blogs and social media posts. It became obvious that team members did not have expertise in marketing or communication skills and had to learn from experience. In addition, it was difficult to build and maintain a following with a changing social media landscape. There is evidence that the project is on its way to meet the project's engagement-related medium-term outcomes, such as being included in national palliative care reports and accreditation programmes as well as international guidelines.
conclusionPublic engagement is a complex, uncertain and non-linear undertaking, requiring continual reflection and refinement in response to changing circumstances within and beyond the research. We believe a key driver for successful engagement has been employing researchers with intellectual disabilities as well as working actively with core stakeholders throughout the project. Our engagement recommendations are: (1) Involve people with lived experience; (2) Plan and allocate time; (3) Include social media and/or marketing roles in research; (4) Tailor to the audience and platform; (5) Make it engaging and fun; (6) Learn how to make videos; (7) Keep presenting your work; and (8) Make time for stakeholder consultations. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The research team included four researchers with intellectual disabilities (A.C., D.J., L.J. and R.K.-B.). Researchers with intellectual disabilities have been part of every step of the research process; from study design to data collection and analysis to dissemination of study findings, including engagement activities. Palliative care and intellectual disability service provider representatives (G.A., M.W., N.P., R.H. and S.S.) have been closely involved throughout the project. The research was supported by a Research Advisory Group comprising a variety of stakeholders, including people with intellectual disabilities, families, representatives from intellectual disability and palliative care organisations, and policymakers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.