ArticleJMIR cancer2026
Identifying Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis and Describing Outcomes Using Computable Phenotypes: Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in JMIR cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a life-threatening hyperinflammatory syndrome that requires rapid diagnosis and intervention. However, identifying these patients is difficult because the HLH-2004 diagnostic criteria are complex and not always captured systematically in electronic health records (EHRs). Furthermore, it is unclear how clinicians use these criteria to diagnose HLH and make treatment decisions. There is a critical need for validated computable phenotypes to accurately identify patients and study treatment-related outcomes in HLH. Objective: The aim of this study is to compare different approaches to using the EHR to build computable phenotypes of patients with HLH and to evaluate characteristics and outcomes of patients meeting the HLH-2004 diagnostic criteria who received HLH-directed therapies compared to those who did not. Methods: Three approaches to computable phenotype development in the EHR were taken by identifying patients (1) with an HLH-specific International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) code, (2) with an HLH-specific treatment plan, and (3) meeting the HLH-2004 clinical criteria for diagnosis of HLH. Among patients who met the HLH-2004 criteria, we evaluated the characteristics and outcomes of patients who received HLH-directed therapies compared to those who did not. HLH treatment was defined as either any chemotherapy or HLH-specific therapy (dexamethasone, methylprednisolone, anakinra, ruxolitinib, cyclosporine, etoposide, or emapalumab). Results: We identified 388 patients with possible HLH across the three cohorts. An HLH ICD-10 diagnosis (n=220) and meeting 5 or more clinical criteria (n=245) were much more common than a HLH treatment plan (n=42). Among the patients meeting HLH-2004 clinical criteria, 193 (79%) received HLH-directed therapy. There was no difference in any specific HLH criteria between those who did and did not receive HLH-directed therapy. In-hospital mortality was very high among both groups and was 15% among those who received HLH-directed therapy and 13.5% among those who did not receive HLH-directed therapy. Among 1325 patients with an elevated ferritin and fever, only 252 (19%) met >5 clinical criteria. Conclusions: Constructing HLH cohorts from EHR data is challenging, with diagnosis codes, treatment plans, and clinical criteria each capturing distinct but overlapping populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.