Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41886742›Full record

ArticleJMIR nursing2026

Changes in Nurse-Patient Communication Through Health Technologies and Nursing Practices to Recognize and Support Limited Digital Health Literacy: Qualitative Study.

Eline Mariosé Dijkman, Jobke Wentzel, David Edvardsson, Carine Doggen, Constance Helène Christine Drossaert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eline Mariosé DijkmanDepartment of Surgery, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3876-3404
Jobke WentzelDepartment of Health and Social Studies, Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, Zwolle, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3897-4436
David EdvardssonDepartment of Nursing, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8787-2327
Carine DoggenHealth Technology & Services Research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4766-4333
Constance Helène Christine DrossaertDepartment of Psychology, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, Enschede, 7522 NB, The Netherlands, 31 053 489 911.ORCID 0000-0002-7083-3169

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In the past decade, the use of health technologies, such as telemonitoring, video consultations, and patient portals, has increased. However, it remains unclear how these technologies have influenced nurse-patient communication. Additionally, little is known about the role nurses play in recognizing and supporting limited (digital) health literacy patients. Objective: This study aimed to explore which health technologies are currently being used in a hospital context and how nurse-patient communication has changed as a result. Furthermore, we sought to identify the practices nurses use and the barriers they experience in recognizing and supporting patients with limited digital health literacy. Methods: This is a qualitative descriptive study that used semistructured interviews with nurses working in a hospital (n=21). The interview guide was partly based on the 6-function model of medical communication by de Haes and Bensing. All interview transcripts were analyzed by 2 independent coders using a combination of deductive and inductive approaches. Results: According to the nurses, health technologies have impacted all 6 functions of nurse-patient communication. They noted improvements in gathering information, providing information, enabling disease and treatment management, and responding to patients' emotions. In contrast, technology made fostering the relationship more difficult, and technologies were seldom used in shared decision-making. Nurses identified limited digital health literacy through intuition, observation of verbal and nonverbal cues, and direct questioning. To support patients with limited digital health literacy, nurses relied on building trust, involving the social network, tailoring communication, and offering additional support. High workload and limited knowledge were the main barriers to applying these practices. Conclusions: Our findings show that health technologies have significantly influenced nurse-patient communication in the hospital setting. The results highlight the need for tailored training programs to strengthen nurses' competencies in identifying and supporting patients with limited digital health literacy. This is essential to ensure more comprehensible and accessible care and promote equitable patient engagement with health technologies.

Indexed as

Biomedical TechnologyCommunicationHealth LiteracyNurse-Patient RelationsAdultDigital HealthFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchdigital health literacyeHealth literacyhealth literacyhospitalhospitalsnurse-patient communicationnursingtailored communication

Identifiers

PMID41886742
PMCPMC13021102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.