Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41886736›Full record

ArticleJMIR diabetes2026

Experiences of Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Using Digital Health Technology for Diabetes Self-Care: Qualitative Study.

Divya Anna Stephen, Jan Nilsson, Unn-Britt Johansson, Anna Nordin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR diabetes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Divya Anna StephenDepartment of Health Science, Faculty for Health, Nature and Technology, Karlstad University, Universitetsgatan 2, Karlstad, 651 88, Sweden, 46 733016592.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6116-3848
Jan NilssonDepartment of Health Science, Faculty for Health, Nature and Technology, Karlstad University, Universitetsgatan 2, Karlstad, 651 88, Sweden, 46 733016592.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6245-1788
Unn-Britt JohanssonDepartment of Health Promoting Science, Sophiahemmet University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3309-136X
Anna NordinDepartment of Health Science, Faculty for Health, Nature and Technology, Karlstad University, Universitetsgatan 2, Karlstad, 651 88, Sweden, 46 733016592.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8709-342X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Type 1 diabetes is a constraining disease due to the burden of its management, and diabetes outcome largely depends on the effectiveness of diabetes self-care. Digital health technology (DHT), which includes continuous glucose monitoring, insulin delivery devices, and related mobile health apps, can support diabetes self-care and thereby improve diabetes outcomes. In literature, experiences with the use of DHT vary widely among people with diabetes and are a less studied area among adults with type 1 diabetes. Objective: The study aimed to explore experiences of using DHT for diabetes self-care among adults with type 1 diabetes. Methods: A qualitative design with an inductive approach was used. Adults with type 1 diabetes who are users of DHT and could understand Swedish were included in the study. Participants were recruited primarily via digital advertisements through social media. A convenient sampling method was used. Data were collected through open-ended questions in a web-based survey (autumn 2022) and 2 digital group interviews (autumn 2024). The survey questionnaire and interview guide attempted to capture positive and negative experiences of using DHTs for diabetes self-care through personally relevant incidents and behavioral details. Data from a total of 161 participants (n=156 survey participants and n=5 interview participants), using 1 or more forms of DHTs, were included in the study. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis with an inductive approach as per Graneheim and Lundman. The data in this study generated 324 meaning units relevant to the aim. Results: The participants experienced using DHTs in diabetes self-care as a balancing act between feeling empowered and feeling exasperated. This is described under 5 categories: promoting autonomy in daily life, self-awareness through collaborative learning, feeling secure, tackling technical challenges and the need for support, and navigating the burden of psychosocial challenges. DHTs were experienced as empowering when they supported autonomy in daily life, enhanced self-awareness through collaborative learning, and fostered a sense of security. However, having to tackle technical challenges and the need for support, and navigating the burden of psychosocial challenges, led to feelings of exasperation. The exasperating experiences hindered participants from experiencing a full sense of empowerment with DHT use. Conclusions: This study sheds light on both positive and negative experiences of using DHTs for diabetes self-care in a real-life setting. The exasperating experiences may widen the digital health inequities and therefore are important to address. Improving technological literacy and ongoing support from health care or device manufacturers may help users to address exasperating experiences. Further studies are needed to validate our findings.

Indexed as

digital technologyexperiencesqualitative researchself caretype 1 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID41886736
PMCPMC13021107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.