ArticlePLOS digital health2026
Safeguarding patient privacy in eHealth systems: Bridging theory and practice through a scoping review and healthcare survey.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of eHealth technologies in hospitals has transformed patient care while raising privacy concerns. To address the latter, this paper combines a scoping review with a survey of healthcare professionals to examine both theoretical and practical aspects of privacy in hospital eHealth systems. Publications from 2021 to June 2024 focusing on privacy in hospital eHealth systems were reviewed. Literature was retrieved from PubMed, IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, and Web of Science, resulting in 1,556 initial records. Additionally, 122 healthcare professionals from Swiss and German hospital networks were surveyed using purposive and convenience sampling regarding their perceptions of privacy measures and implementation challenges. From 434 included studies, 339 focused on technical measures, 40 on organizational processes, 29 on patient perspectives and ethical considerations, and 26 on legal and regulatory aspects. Key technical advancements included blockchain and AI. The survey revealed that participants primarily associated privacy with confidentiality of patient data and protection against unauthorized access. Most identified insufficient training, lack of standardization, and inadequate existing measures as key implementation challenges, thus highlighting gaps between theoretical privacy concepts and practical implementation in healthcare settings. While technical solutions dominate the literature, the survey emphasizes the importance of staff perspectives, particularly regarding confidentiality, access controls, training, and standardization. An integrated framework addressing technical, organizational, and workflow-specific privacy measures is proposed to bridge the theory-practice gap. Future eHealth privacy frameworks should balance technological innovation with practical implementation considerations that incorporate healthcare professionals' insights to effectively safeguard patient data.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.