Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41886728›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

SGA-DT: An adaptive fusion framework for missing data imputation and interpretable healthcare classification.

Monalisa Jena, Satchidananda Dehuri, Sung-Bae Cho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Monalisa JenaDepartment of Computer Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6687-075X
Satchidananda DehuriDepartment of Computer Science, Fakir Mohan University, Balasore, Odisha, India.
Sung-Bae ChoDepartment of Computer Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7027-2429

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advances in machine learning and medical data processing, handling missing values remains a critical and complex challenge in healthcare analytics. Missing data, especially in non-class attributes can severely compromise model accuracy, clinical reliability, and interpretability. In sensitive domains such as healthcare, improper imputation may lead to biased outcomes or delayed interventions. To address this challenge, we propose SGA-DT, an adaptive and interpretable learning framework that combines the best features of genetically optimized support vector regression (SVR) with a decision tree (DT) classifier for robust healthcare prediction. The framework adaptively selects an imputation strategy based on the level of missingness. It uses standard SVR for low, iterative SVR for moderate, and k-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) followed by SVR refinement for high missingness. Genetic algorithm (GA) is used to select the best SVR kernel and tune its hyperparameters, enhancing imputation accuracy across different data patterns. The complete dataset is then classified using DT, providing both robustness and transparency in prediction. The SGA-DT framework is evaluated on three healthcare datasets, Breast Cancer, Mammographic, and Hepatitis, along with other real-world and synthetic datasets. For interpretability analysis, decision trees are generated under varying missingness levels to support clinical transparency. Comparative results show that SGA-DT consistently outperforms multiple integrated frameworks across accuracy, precision, recall, and F-measure, demonstrating its robustness, interpretability, and generalizability in healthcare prediction tasks.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareAlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsDecision TreesGenetic AlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID41886728
PMCPMC13021172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.