Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41886726›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Prostate cancer tissue mapping and stratification using DRAQ5 and Eosin fluorescent labels integrated with AI classification and segmentation algorithms.

Michail Georgios Papachristos, Emiliano Spezi, Carolina Fuentes, Ioulia Evangelou, David Hywel Thomas, Fiyinfoluwa Akinade, Marie Wiltshire, Anna Wilson, Rachel J Errington, Dimitris Parthimos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michail Georgios PapachristosSchool of Medicine, Division of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8791-8227
Emiliano SpeziSchool of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1452-8813
Carolina FuentesSchool of Computer Science and Informatics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0871-939X
Ioulia EvangelouSwansea Bay UHB Pathology Laboratories, Morriston, Singleton, Swansea, United Kingdom.
David Hywel ThomasDepartment of Cellular Pathology, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Fiyinfoluwa AkinadeSchool of Medicine, Division of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Marie WiltshireSchool of Medicine, Division of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Anna WilsonUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.
Rachel J ErringtonSchool of Medicine, Division of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Dimitris ParthimosSchool of Medicine, Division of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFluorescent microscopy using the DRAQ5 and Eosin probes has been shown in the literature to be capable of producing rapid tissue characterization through synthetic H&E-like pseudoimages, which can be potentially utilized in the clinic. This study focuses on developing deep learning models for classification and segmentation of prostate tissue labeled with DRAQ5&Eosin. The fluorophores provide highly specific features of nuclear and cytoplasmic content that allows for enhanced spatial resolution and multi-parametric analytics. The inter-dependencies of image acquisition and configuration variability on AI predictive accuracy is systematically interrogated. We are thus able to establish limits on experimental and analytical robustness in automated Gleason Grading (1-5) tissue samples of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsA labeling technique based on a far-red DNA probe DRAQ5, and Eosin allowed us to generate a two-channel fluorescent readout of prostatic tissue samples. Deep learning networks were employed to classify and segment DRAQ5 and Eosin fluorescent image regions into healthy and high/low grade cancerous tissue. A subset of images were acquired with variable microscopy configurations (focus, noise, zoom, lens) to evaluate the robustness of the proposed experimental-analytical pipeline and reproducibility of predictions.

resultsMachine Leaning classifiers of High Grade Cancer (Gleason pattern 4 or 5) vs Healthy, Low Grade Cancer (Gleason pattern 3) vs Healthy, and High Grade Cancer vs Low Grade Cancer achieved an area under the curve of 0.9314, 0.8398, and 0.7715 respectively. Pixel wide cancer segmentation attained DICE scores of 0.8436, 0.5138, and 0.705 for background, healthy, and cancerous tissue respectively. The segmentation model also displayed robustness against a broad range of induced acquisition variability.

conclusionOverall, DRAQ5 and Eosin labeling in combination with AI tools demonstrate a potential pipeline used in diagnostic clinical application when employing fluorescent imaging. Future research could expand and bring this combined fluorescent biomarker and AI methodology to the clinic.

Indexed as

Eosine Yellowish-(YS)Fluorescent DyesProstatic NeoplasmsAlgorithmsDeep LearningHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMicroscopy, FluorescenceNeoplasm GradingProstateEosine Yellowish-(YS)Fluorescent Dyes

Identifiers

PMID41886726
PMCPMC13021167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.