Article in American journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Caila BranderCaila Brander and Kate Grindlay are with Ibis Reproductive Health, Cambridge, MA. Caitlin Russell is with the School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. Elisa Cardnell is with Service Women's Action Network, Washington, DC. Caitlin Gerdts is with Ibis Reproductive Health, Oakland, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-1274-1848
Kate GrindlayCaila Brander and Kate Grindlay are with Ibis Reproductive Health, Cambridge, MA. Caitlin Russell is with the School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. Elisa Cardnell is with Service Women's Action Network, Washington, DC. Caitlin Gerdts is with Ibis Reproductive Health, Oakland, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-4426-3710
Caitlin RussellCaila Brander and Kate Grindlay are with Ibis Reproductive Health, Cambridge, MA. Caitlin Russell is with the School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. Elisa Cardnell is with Service Women's Action Network, Washington, DC. Caitlin Gerdts is with Ibis Reproductive Health, Oakland, CA.ORCID 0009-0007-0156-7892
Elisa CardnellCaila Brander and Kate Grindlay are with Ibis Reproductive Health, Cambridge, MA. Caitlin Russell is with the School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. Elisa Cardnell is with Service Women's Action Network, Washington, DC. Caitlin Gerdts is with Ibis Reproductive Health, Oakland, CA.
Caitlin GerdtsCaila Brander and Kate Grindlay are with Ibis Reproductive Health, Cambridge, MA. Caitlin Russell is with the School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. Elisa Cardnell is with Service Women's Action Network, Washington, DC. Caitlin Gerdts is with Ibis Reproductive Health, Oakland, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-2488-5072
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
US military service members have long faced challenges accessing reproductive health care, especially abortion. The 2022
Indexed as
Abortion, InducedAbortion, LegalHealth Services AccessibilityMilitary PersonnelSupreme Court DecisionsAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyQualitative ResearchUnited States
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Access to Abortion for US Military Service Members in 2024 After the · full record | OpenQuestion