Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41886699›Full record

ArticleJCO oncology practice2026

Acute Care Events During Systemic Cancer Treatment: Moving From Risk Prediction to Clinical Decision Support Using a Two-Model Approach.

Jacob Newton Stein, Soroush Fariman, Yishu Zhang, Bahjat Qaqish, Jennifer Elston Lafata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO oncology practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jacob Newton SteinDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0000-0002-2082-2760
Soroush FarimanDivision of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0000-0002-6193-9578
Yishu ZhangDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Bahjat QaqishLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC.
Jennifer Elston LafataLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0000-0002-8550-6195

Funding

North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS)UM1TR004406 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI NICHOLAS J SHAHEEN · 2023 to 2026
$37.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAcute care events (ACEs, emergency department visits and hospitalizations) are burdensome among patients with cancer-many are preventable. Prognostic risk models have not been consistently deployed as a preventive strategy. We convened a Clinical Advisory Panel (CAP) to address this translational bottleneck and develop clinically and statistically valid prognostic models to enable risk-stratified intervention.

methodsWe identified patients age 21+ years initiating cancer treatment at an academic center or affiliated sites. We extracted sociodemographic and clinical information from the EHR. Data were divided into training (50%), validation (25%), and test (25%) sets. Models were developed using constrained elastic-net logistic regression, with clinically informed coefficient constraints.

resultsIn all, 4,697 patients were included, the mean age was 64 years, 71.9% were White, 21.8% had GI cancers, 21.7% had hematologic malignancies, 46.0% were Medicare insured, 77.6% were receiving chemotherapy, and 25.4% were receiving immunotherapy. We developed two models with our CAP, a baseline model predicting risk using a planned anticancer regimen and a follow-up model updating with drug dispensing and clinical changes. ACE in the previous month was the strongest predictor in both models (odds ratio [OR], 1.5, baseline model), with chemotherapy receipt (OR, 1.18), heart failure (OR, 1.22), abnormal international normalized ratio (OR, 1.30), and late-stage cancer (OR, 1.20) contributing. Both had acceptable statistical performance (C-statistic 0.71 and 0.70) and identified patients at the highest risk for ACE.

conclusionWe present a novel approach to ACE prediction among patients receiving cancer treatment using two models to anticipate patients' risk before treatment starts and then update based on clinical trajectory, facilitated by engagement of a CAP. To prevent ACE, risk-stratified interventions should focus on the factors we observed-optimizing comorbidities, proactively managing symptoms from high-toxicity regimens, or advanced disease.

Identifiers

PMID41886699
PMCPMC13417144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.